Bitcoin SV (BSV) investors are attempting to revive a 2019 lawsuit against Binance, alleging that the exchange’s delisting of BSV caused prolonged price declines. The plaintiffs argue that a 2024 UK Competition Appeal Tribunal ruling dismissing their “loss of opportunity” claim should be reconsidered. The original lawsuit sought $9 billion in damages, but the revived case aims for up to £10 billion (~$13 billion).
👉 Stay updated on crypto legal developments
Key Details of the Case
- Initial Delisting: Binance removed BSV in April 2019, citing failure to meet listing standards due to controversial actions by Craig Wright, BSV’s founder who falsely claimed to be Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto.
- Legal Arguments: Plaintiffs contend the delisting constituted anti-competitive behavior that artificially suppressed BSV’s market value.
- Jurisdictional Note: The case highlights the growing scrutiny of cryptocurrency exchanges’ governance policies across global jurisdictions.
Market Impact of Delistings
Cryptocurrency exchanges wield significant influence over asset valuations through listing decisions. Binance’s 2019 BSV delisting triggered:
– Immediate 15% price drop
– Subsequent 70% decline over 12 months
– Reduced liquidity across trading pairs
| Exchange | BSV Delisting Date | Price Drop (7-Day) |
|---|---|---|
| Binance | April 15, 2019 | -19.2% |
| Kraken | April 17, 2019 | -12.8% |
| Shapeshift | April 22, 2019 | -9.5% |
Legal Precedents in Crypto
This case could establish important guidelines regarding:
– Exchange liability for delisting decisions
– Quantifiable damages from lost trading opportunities
– Jurisdictional boundaries in global crypto markets
👉 Explore crypto legal frameworks
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Why did Binance originally delist BSV?
A: Binance cited Craig Wright’s controversial claims about being Satoshi Nakamoto and overall project standards as reasons for the 2019 delisting.
Q: What legal theory supports the $13 billion claim?
A: Plaintiffs argue Binance’s dominant market position made the delisting anti-competitive, creating artificial price suppression.
Q: How might this affect other delisted cryptocurrencies?
A: A successful lawsuit could empower other delisted projects to pursue similar claims, potentially changing exchange listing policies.
Q: What’s unique about the UK legal approach?
A: The Competition Appeal Tribunal specializes in complex economic cases, offering plaintiffs specialized judicial review.
Q: How long might this case take to resolve?
A: Given appeals and procedural complexity, final resolution could require 2-3 years of litigation.
Q: What defenses is Binance likely to use?
A: Expect arguments about exchange autonomy, lack of fiduciary duty to token holders, and market-wide price influences.
The outcome of this revived lawsuit could significantly impact how cryptocurrency exchanges manage listing decisions and their legal responsibilities toward investors. As the case progresses, it may establish important precedents at the intersection of blockchain technology and securities law.