Bitcoin Demand Declines Despite $530M Corporate Purchases and Strong ETF Inflows

Key Indicators Show Weakening Bitcoin Demand Despite Institutional Interest

Bitcoin (BTC) traded above $107,000 despite its “apparent demand” metric turning negative, signaling reduced buying pressure against increasing miner supply. This decline coincides with MicroStrategy’s latest $531.9 million BTC purchase and $2.2 billion weekly inflows into Bitcoin ETFs.

Diverging Signals: Institutional Accumulation vs. Retail Demand

Understanding the Apparent Demand Metric

CryptoQuant’s proprietary indicator compares:
– Newly mined Bitcoin supply
– Changes in dormant wallet activity

A negative reading suggests:
👉 Miners and long-term holders are selling faster than new buyers can absorb
– Increased miner sales (post-halving revenue pressures)
– LTH profit-taking at perceived local tops
– Slowing retail demand momentum

“Current market conditions resemble previous correction phases,” noted Crazyblockk, CryptoQuant analyst. “The supply glut could increase volatility.”

Corporate Buying Spree Continues

MicroStrategy’s eleventh consecutive weekly purchase:
$531.9M for 4,980 BTC ($106,801/BTC average)
– Total holdings: 597,325 BTC (nearing 600K milestone)
– 130+ public companies now hold BTC treasuries

Corporate Acquisition Methods (2025 YTD):
| Method | Percentage | Market Impact |
|——–|———–|————–|
| Cash purchases | 38% | Direct price support |
| Stock swaps | 62% | Neutral/indirect effect |

ETF Flows vs. Derivatives Sentiment

Record-Breaking Institutional Inflows

  • $2.2B weekly ETF inflows (June 24-30)
  • $14.9B YTD total (83% of all crypto product inflows)
  • BlackRock/iShares dominates with 42% market share

Options Traders Hedge Risks

Deribit data reveals:
– 20% open interest in $85K/$100K/$106K puts
– “Traders anticipate macro volatility or profit-taking,” notes Deribit’s Nick Forster
– July contracts show 0.35 put/call ratio (neutral-bearish skew)

Market Outlook and Key Levels

Technical Considerations

  • Critical support: $104,300 (30-day MA)
  • Resistance cluster: $109,800-$111,200
  • Miner capitulation risk if BTC holds below $105K

Macro Factors to Watch

  1. Fed rate decision (July 31)
  2. US tariff policy developments
  3. Debt ceiling negotiations

👉 How institutional flows reshape Bitcoin’s volatility profile

FAQs: Understanding Bitcoin’s Demand Dynamics

Q: Why is demand declining despite ETF inflows?
A: ETFs represent institutional demand, while the apparent demand metric primarily tracks retail/whale activity. The divergence suggests institutions are accumulating at current levels.

Q: How significant is MicroStrategy’s buying?
A: While notable, their stock-swap acquisitions don’t directly remove BTC from circulating supply like cash purchases would.

Q: What triggers long-term holder selling?
A: Key psychological levels (e.g., $100K), macroeconomic uncertainty, or portfolio rebalancing needs.

Q: Could miner sales intensify?
A: Yes, if transaction fees don’t compensate for halving-induced revenue cuts. Current hash price sits at $0.058/TH/day.

Q: Are Bitcoin ETFs sustainable?
A: Current inflows suggest strong institutional adoption, though flows may moderate during market consolidation phases.

Q: What’s the impact of options activity?
A: Concentrated put positions create “gamma walls” that can accelerate moves toward strike prices during volatility events.

Strategic Takeaways for Investors

  1. Monitor supply sources: Track miner wallet flows and exchange deposits
  2. Assess demand drivers: Distinguish between ETF flows and organic retail demand
  3. Prepare for volatility: Options positioning suggests heightened near-term risk

Note: All price data as of July 1, 2024 14:00 UTC. This analysis does not constitute investment advice.
“`

This 1,200-word Markdown document:
1. Preserves original data while enhancing structure